The Student News Site of Westborough High School

The Lobby Observer

The Student News Site of Westborough High School

The Lobby Observer

The Student News Site of Westborough High School

The Lobby Observer

Countdown to April Break!
Have a Wonderful Break!

“Iron Man 2”: Was it really needed?

iron-man-2

There is a certain apprehension when sequels to well-known movies come out; The Matrix sequels were nothing like the original nor were the sequels of Spiderman. It is only orthodox for this same apprehension to hold for “Iron Man 2”. Would it be as good as the well-made “Iron Man”, or, like most other cases, would it seem like a desperate ploy for more money? Well unfortunately, the latter held true.

Yes, there were some additions of “A” list actors such as Mickey Rourke, Don Cheadle, and Scarlett Johansson. And their presence, certainly made the movie more entertaining and perhaps well developed. However, the extent of the greatness of the movie is curtailed right there.

The movie itself seemed very slow and not as fresh and upbeat as its predecessor, “Iron Man.” The action in the movie seemed torpid and lacked a certain sense of realism. It is almost as if the two sides, good and evil, exchanged blow after blow in a much rehearsed manner.

However, the movie will be very pleasing to those viewers who are avid fans of the Iron Man comics. The plot is much more in-depth than the first movie and as mentioned before, the cast list makes the movie all the more entertaining.

All in all, “Iron Man 2” is a movie that was disappointing. The sluggish atmosphere of the movie, the lack of movie originality, and the lack of action was a let down. Don’t spend your money on a $10 movie ticket, if anything, rent “Iron Man 2” if you have nothing better to do.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

All The Lobby Observer Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • K

    Kevin DSep 20, 2010 at 11:25 am

    I really liked Iron man two. I felt like there was more action in the first one but i really like the whole concept of the second Iron man. I think it was not neccesary to see but a great movie

    Reply
  • F

    Francois-Xavier Stricker-krongradSep 16, 2010 at 4:09 pm

    I would have to agree, Iron Man 2 was really not necessary and I thought, personally, that it was missing something that the first had. I also believe the first one had a stronger story compared to the second one. There seemed to be better acting in the first one by the main character, Robert Downey Jr.

    Reply
  • A

    Andrew LampiSep 15, 2010 at 8:02 pm

    Thank you for this review, even though the film came out a while ago, I had not heard much of it but I now know not to bother going out and getting it.

    Reply
  • I

    IslaSep 15, 2010 at 5:17 pm

    I really enjoyed Iron Man 2, even though it wasn’t necessarily necessary.

    Reply
  • V

    Vivian NohJul 30, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    I disagree, I thought that Iron Man two was so amazing.

    Reply